Keeping small defense suppliers eligible to bid
Fewer small firms win federal work every year. On November 10 the Pentagon's cyber rule starts requiring audits that cost a small supplier about $100,000. The software money went to proposals.
Neil Gaikwad
The gap
The federal government spends about $793B a year on contracts, and small businesses take roughly 28% of it, above the 23% goal. That headline hides the trend that matters. The number of small firms doing the work keeps falling: from about 121,000 in 2010 to 56,725 last year. The dollars are concentrating in fewer hands.
Most of the venture money that noticed this market went to winning bids: opportunity search and AI proposal writing. GovDash, Procurement Sciences, Vultron, GovEagle and GovSignals all raised in the last two years, and incumbents like Unanet now bundle proposal AI into their ERP. Drafting is getting crowded.
The quieter problem sits one step earlier: staying eligible to bid at all. For defense suppliers that now means CMMC, a cybersecurity certification with its own controls, evidence, assessors and timelines. Large primes have compliance teams. A 15-person machine shop or engineering firm has an office manager and a consultant's quote.
Why now
The deadline is set. The CMMC program rule took effect in December 2024 and the contract clause in November 2025. Phase 2, which brings third-party Level 2 assessments into new contracts, starts November 10, 2026.
The government priced the burden itself. DoD estimates about $104,670 over three years for a small entity's Level 2 assessment and affirmations, before the cost of becoming compliant. More than half of contractors in Deltek's 2025 study expected compliance costs to rise.
The paperwork is model-shaped. CMMC readiness is mostly policies, evidence collection and mapping controls to proof, the kind of document work that got much cheaper as model prices fell between 9 and 900 times a year, depending on the task.
Who pays, and how they buy
The buyer is the owner or operations lead of a defense supplier with 10 to 100 people, often a subcontractor two tiers below a prime. They are not choosing whether to comply. Their prime will ask for proof, and the clause will sit in the contract.
Today they pay consultants, managed service providers and assessors, or they use free help from APEX Accelerators where they can get it. Firms that cannot afford either face a quiet exit from the defense supply chain.
Money already moving
- DoD's own cost estimate for a small firm's three-year Level 2 assessment is $104,670, before remediation. govinfo.gov
- Enterprise contractors report having already spent $100,000 or more each on CMMC readiness. deltek.com
- SAM.gov sees more than 56,000 entity registrations created or renewed every month, a standing chore to stay eligible. origin-www.gsa.gov
- Small businesses already pay for bid tools at $720 to $3,600 a year. semafor.com
The wedge I would back
An eligibility desk for small defense suppliers. It scopes which systems hold controlled information, walks the team through the controls in plain language, collects the evidence as people work, keeps the System Security Plan current, and hands the assessor a clean package. Then it keeps SAM registration and certifications from lapsing.
I would sell it through the primes. A prime with hundreds of small suppliers needs them certified on time, and has a reason to pay for or recommend one tool across its supply chain.
What I would not fundAnother AI proposal writer. The layer has at least five funded startups and incumbents bundling it in, and a better proposal does not help a firm that cannot bid.
The founder I would back
Someone who has done CMMC or NIST 800-171 work for small manufacturers, an assessor or compliance consultant tired of doing it by hand, paired with an engineer who can build on the systems these firms already run.
Who is already building
| Company | What it does | Stage and last round |
|---|---|---|
| GovDash | Discovery, capture, proposals and contract management for contractors | $30M Series B led by Mucker and BCI Jan 2026 · govdash.com |
| Procurement Sciences | Awarded AI, a contracting life-cycle platform; bought Rogue AI | $30M Series B led by Catalyst Nov 2025 · executivebiz.com |
| Vultron | AI proposal platform for federal contractors | Series A led by Greycroft, $22M raised in total Jul 2025 · pulse2.com |
| GovSignals | From spotting opportunities to drafting compliant bids | $5.5M seed led by Unusual Ventures Dec 2024 · govsignals.ai |
| GovEagle | AI proposal platform | $2.5M from Strategic Cyber Ventures and Y Combinator Mar 2025 · causeartist.com |
| Sweetspot | AI contract search and applications for small firms | $2.2M seed led by 1984 Ventures Aug 2024 · semafor.com |
| Starbridge | State and local sales intelligence for public-sector vendors | $42M Series A led by Craft Ventures Oct 2025 · govtech.com |
As of Oct 2026
Risks
- Spend is concentrating: GAO found DoD dollars to small businesses rising while the number of small firms fell, a decade-long pattern. gao.gov
- Consolidation policy pushes common purchases through GSA-managed contracts, and the number of small vendors for common goods fell every year. gao.gov
- Policy volatility: DOGE-era terminations reached 6,335 contracts by April 2025, and 61% had gone to small businesses. govspend.com
- Contractor confidence hit a six-year low in Deltek's 2025 study, and small firms report the most difficulty adopting AI. deltek.com
Sources
- GAO, Government-wide contracting FY2025
- SBA, FY25 small business contracting scorecard (Jun 2026)
- Washington Technology, Small business prime awards fell in FY2025
- HigherGov, Small business trends (Feb 2023)
- Federal Register, CMMC program final rule (Oct 2024)
- Wiley, DoD CMMC DFARS final rule (Sep 2025)
- Deltek, 16th Clarity government contracting study (May 2025)
- GAO-25-108638, Federal buying power and common spending (Sep 2025)
- GovSpend, Tracking terminations under DOGE (Apr 2025)
- Epoch AI, LLM inference price trends (Mar 2025)
Nothing here is investment advice: these are my own notes on public information, written to sharpen judgment, not to recommend buying or selling anything.