Venture

Where the next decade of value gets made

I spent two years on the evaluation side, screening more than 150 early-stage startups and writing the memos, and the rest of my time building companies from zero. This page is where I think the next decade of value gets made: six big bets, the maps behind them, and the quiet markets I would back at pre-seed.

01 · Big bets

Where the next trillions get made

Six shifts I would build a fund around for the next ten years. Each memo says what the consensus misses, where the value pools, and where a seed check can still win.

01$4.6T in labor and outsourcing

Services sold as software

Software sold seats to people. The next decade sells the finished work, and that budget is labor: more than ten times what the world spends on software.

Conviction HighScales by 2030 Read the memo
02$2.6T drug market by 2030

Medicine becomes a design problem

AI made the first step of drug discovery cheap. The money goes to whoever owns the data, the lab loop and the clinical asset, not the model.

Conviction HighScales by 2031 Read the memo
03945 TWh of data center demand by 2030

Electrons are the new GPUs

AI stopped being limited by chips and started being limited by power. This decade, speed to electricity is the product, and most of it will not come from new reactors.

Conviction HighScales by 2029 Read the memo
04$5T humanoid market by 2050 (Morgan Stanley)

The body is a commodity. The brain is the company.

Robot bodies are getting cheap fast, mostly in China. The value pools in the models, the training data and the narrow jobs where a robot can work today.

Conviction MediumScales by 2034 Read the memo
05$1.5T US defense request for 2027

Defense becomes a manufacturing race

Everyone is funding drones and autonomy. The constraint is production: factories, shipyards, rocket motors and cheap interceptors. That is where I would put the next check.

Conviction MediumScales by 2030 Read the memo
06$2T in stablecoins by 2028 (Standard Chartered)

The dollar moves onto new rails

Stablecoins are not a crypto story anymore. They are dollars that settle in seconds, and the incumbents are already buying the rails. The opening is at the edges.

Conviction HighScales by 2030 Read the memo
Height shows the annual value at stake, in trillions of dollars, by the year each shift reaches scale. Placement is my judgment from the figures in each memo.
02 · Market maps

Who builds what, and who funds it

One map for each big bet, the capital stack at pre-seed and seed, the quiet markets and the wider AI stack. Placements are checked against what each company ships.

Services as software, by layerFrom the models to the firms that sell finished work. Value concentrates at the top and the bottom of the stack.
AI-native services and roll-upsOwn the customer and the labor budget.
Roll-upsBuy services firms, run them with agentsLong LakeCrete
Vertical agentsOwn an outcome in one domain.
LegalResearch, drafting and case workHarveyEvenUp
AccountingStatements, returns and closeBasis
Health adminReferrals and intakeTennr
Horizontal agentsWork any company buys.
Software engineeringThe fastest revenue ramps on recordCognitionCursor (SpaceX)
Customer servicePriced per resolutionSierraDecagonIntercom FinSalesforce Agentforce
Agent infrastructureWhat agents need to be trusted and paid.
Payments and protocolsMachine-native paymentsx402 Foundation
Expert supply and evaluationHumans in the loop, auditsMercorAIUC-1
ModelsThe engines underneath.
Frontier labsCapital-intensive and concentratedOpenAIAnthropicGoogle

As of Oct 2026

The seed market in numbers

86%
Share of US venture dollars that went to AI companies in the first half of 2026 ($355.9B of $412.7B) H1 2026, PitchBook-NVCA · siliconangle.com
45%
Bay Area share of US seed dollars, up from 28% in 2023 2025, Crunchbase · news.crunchbase.com
28%
Share of US seed dollars that went outside the top four metros, the lowest on record 2025, Crunchbase · news.crunchbase.com
1.3%
Share of 2025 venture funding that went to construction tech, an industry near 13% of global GDP 2025, ConTech Roundup · contechroundup.substack.com
$4.1M
Median priced software seed round, at a $24.3M post-money valuation (Carta data via Waveup) Six months to Jul 2026 · waveup.com
1.9 years
Median time from seed to Series A (Carta data via Waveup) Q4 2025 · waveup.com
~15%
Share of the 2022 seed cohort that raised a Series A within two years, against 30.6% for the 2018 cohort (Carta data via Chronograph) Oct 2024 · chronograph.pe
2.5%
Share of YC's Summer 2026 batch in real estate and construction; government was 0.8% Aug 2026 · timewell.jp
03 · Quiet markets

The Quiet Market Screen

The best pre-seed markets are quiet. Buyers are already paying to solve the problem, badly, and nobody with a term sheet is calling them.

Most early-stage sourcing starts from the technology and works out to a customer. I start from the customer and the money they already spend, and only then ask what the technology now makes possible. It is slower. It also finds markets before the market maps do.

01Paid workarounds

Weight×3

What it looks likeBuyers already spend real money or staff time on a clumsy fix: consultants, offshore assistants, answering services, factoring, spreadsheets someone maintains full time.

How I measure itThe price of the workaround and how many buyers use it. A $40 an hour consultant is a stronger signal than a survey saying the problem is painful.

Where I lookService providers' pricing pages, job boards, freelance marketplaces, trade association benchmark reports.

02Labor-heavy, software-light

Weight×3

What it looks likeThe work runs on phones, paper and people paid by the hour, while the rest of the industry's spend has moved to software.

How I measure itClerical and coordinator headcount in the vertical, and the share of a role spent on admin rather than the craft.

Where I lookBLS occupation data, Census business counts, job postings for coordinators, billers and schedulers in the vertical.

03A cost curve crossing a price point

Weight×2

What it looks likeA capability got cheap enough to undercut what a small buyer pays for the human version today.

How I measure itCost per task with current models against the cost of the person or service it replaces.

Where I lookModel and API price sheets, latency benchmarks, interpreter and answering service rate cards.

04A rule or rail that moved

Weight×2

What it looks likeA regulation, mandate, deadline or new API that forces buyers to change how they work, or opens data that used to be locked.

How I measure itThe date it binds, who it binds, and what it costs to comply by hand.

Where I lookFederal Register, state legislatures, agency rulemaking dockets, platform and carrier API changelogs.

05Few funded founders per buyer

Weight×2

What it looks likeThe buyer base is large and the number of venture-backed companies selling to it is small.

How I measure itMy crowding ratio: funded startups selling to the segment per 10,000 buyers. Low is good.

Where I lookFunding databases, public market maps, accelerator batch lists, conference sponsor lists in the vertical.

06A founder with earned access

Weight×3

What it looks likeSomeone who has done the job, sold to the buyer, or grown up inside the community, and can get ten buyers on the phone this month.

How I measure itNames, not personas. Can the founder list ten buyers who will take the call?

Where I lookThe founder's own history, operator networks, trade associations, community groups.

Scoring

Each signal scores 0 to 3. Multiply by its weight. The top score is 45.

27 and up
Worth a full memo and ten buyer calls
18 to 26
Watch list. Re-score when a rule, a price or a founder changes
Under 18
Pass, and write down why

When I walk away

  • Nobody in the chain pays more than about $100 a month, and there is no transaction to take a share of.
  • A platform the buyer already uses could ship the core feature in a quarter, and has a reason to.
  • The pain shows up in surveys but never in spend.
  • The whole case rests on one rule that a court or a new administration can remove.
  • The founder cannot name ten buyers.
  1. 01Start from the labor, not the model

    I begin with occupation and business-count data and look for large groups of small buyers doing repetitive admin by hand.

  2. 02Find the money already moving

    For each candidate I look for the paid workaround and price it. No workaround, no memo.

  3. 03Count the founders

    I map every funded company selling to the segment and compute the crowding ratio before I form a view.

  4. 04Price the curve

    I cost the task with today's models and compare it to the workaround. The gap is the wedge.

  5. 05Write it to be wrong

    Every memo states the thesis in one sentence, the evidence, and the signals that would make me drop it.

  6. 06Call ten buyers

    The founder-access score stays at zero until real buyers have described the problem in their own words.

Quiet markets · map

The opportunity map

Proof of paid demand against how many funded founders already sell to the buyer. My placement, from the evidence in each memo.

Quiet and paid for Paid for and crowded Quiet for a reason Crowded on a hunch Few funded founders Crowded → Demand in surveys only Demand already paid for → AI coding agentsAI customer supportAI SDRsAI note-takersSubcontractor billingSmall commercial insuranceSmall supplier complianceMultilingual intakeHome care operations
A thesis I wrote upA crowded category, for contrast
  • AI coding agents. Named the most crowded category on CB Insights' map of 400+ AI agent startups. cbinsights.com
  • AI customer support. 176 companies raised money in the twelve months to September 2026. newmarketpitch.com
  • AI SDRs. 110 companies tracked, most of them at seed or pre-seed. extruct.ai
  • AI note-takers. More than 130 companies offer one. aol.com
Quiet markets · memos

Five quiet markets, scored on the screen

Each one ran through the screen. Each names the wedge I would back, who is already building, and what would change my mind.

01Oct 2026

A back office that pays for the caregiver's raise

Caregiver turnover falls from 84% to 53% when pay rises from about $16 an hour to about $19. A small agency can only fund that raise from its back office.

34/45 on the screenFull memo Conviction: High Read the memo
02Oct 2026I build here

A desk for the insurance account nobody can afford to serve

A $45 a month policy pays the agent a few dollars a month. So the smallest businesses are left with one carrier's website or no cover at all, and 73% are under-protected.

32/45 on the screenFull memo Conviction: Medium Read the memo
03Oct 2026

Keeping small defense suppliers eligible to bid

Fewer small firms win federal work every year. On November 10 the Pentagon's cyber rule starts requiring audits that cost a small supplier about $100,000. The software money went to proposals.

32/45 on the screenFull memo Conviction: Exploring Read the memo
04Oct 2026I build here

The billing desk for specialty subcontractors

Owners pay general contractors in about 25 days. General contractors pay their subs in about 57. The money gets stuck one step down, at the firms least able to wait.

31/45 on the screenFull memo Conviction: Medium Read the memo
05Oct 2026I build here

Intake in the caller's language, for work where one call is a case

Machine translation is about to be free. Getting a legal or medical intake right in Spanish, Vietnamese or Tagalog is not, and most voice AI is still built English-first.

28/45 on the screenFull memo Conviction: Medium Read the memo
05 · Standards

How I hold the bar

The rules every memo on this page has to pass before it runs.

Sourced and dated
Every figure carries a source and the date it was true. If I cannot source it, it does not run.
Facts apart from judgment
Reported facts are stated plainly. My own calls are marked as mine.
Written to be wrong
Every thesis names the evidence that would make me drop it, and what would make me more convinced.
Conflicts on the page
Where I build in a space, the memo says so at the top.
Primary sources first
Company facts come from the company, a filing or the round announcement. Market figures come from the agency or the original study.
Re-dated, not quietly edited
When a fact changes, the memo gets a new date and says what moved.

Nothing here is investment advice: these are my own notes on public information, written to sharpen judgment, not to recommend buying or selling anything.

Building in one of these markets, or think I have one wrong? Send it over.

Email me Book a call
↑ ↓ to moveEnter to openEsc to close